A few weeks ago I asked a group of teachers to describe a lesson where technology was used effectively to impact learning. After som
Via EDTECH@UTRGV
Get Started for FREE
Sign up with Facebook Sign up with X
I don't have a Facebook or a X account
Your new post is loading...
Your new post is loading...
|
Becky Christensen's comment,
July 15, 2016 8:52 AM
This article gives me hope that someday the Internet will be a real resource for specific information without the mountains of unnecessary information that doesn't really apply to my searches.
Edinson Uriarte's curator insight,
November 14, 2016 8:25 AM
Do you know the answer to the next simple question? "What do you know about web 2.0 technology?" What's so interesting about this video, is the simple fact that none of these so called digital natives are familiar with the term web 2.0.
Peter B. Sloep's curator insight,
March 25, 2013 12:33 PM
Tony Bates reports that he has "grown increasingly convinced that [web 2.0 tools] have the power to really revolutionize university teaching in particular". Unfortunately, he says, formal post-secondary education shows few signs of have understood this message. This is a pity, he continues, as web 2.0 tools i) can facilitate 21st century knowledge workers, ii) lend themselves to constructivist approaches, iii) are familiar to students, iv) are more engaging for student.
These are the reasons most people will mention for why we should invoke web 2.0 tools. However, Tony's fifth reason is not so familiar and arguably the most powerful one. Eventually, he claims, web 2.0 tools will radically change student assessment. No more paper and pencil or computer marked assignments, but assignment via portfolios and the use of multimedia. That of course requires us to rethink the idea of a course completely.
It also shows that MOOCs really are 'education as we know it' in an online mould. If Tony is right, then we may wonder if quality will prevail (that is redesign of education making full use of the affordances of web 2.0 tools) or if maximizing revenues will prevail (that is, sticking to existing models but broadcasting the content even more widely). Seen in this way, MOOCs really are web 1.0, the information web, rather than the social web that web 2.0 is. So, a step back rather than a step forward. (@pbsloep)
Louise Lewis's curator insight,
March 26, 2013 6:30 AM
Yes, totally agree with the comments re MOOCS being web 1.0 but what if they are just another resources for a learner in a learner-centred environment?
|
I agree, in order for a technology-enhanced lesson to be effective, the technology has to fade into the background and just be the tool for getting the work done.
The fact that the students are engaged in a lesson doesn't mean that they really learn anything...  How to make sure they learn through technologies ?